Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile vs Arc 130T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 130T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 35W)
Arc 130T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 69% (2200MHz vs 1300MHz)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU Mobile
1997
Arc 130T Mobile
+97%
3942
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
768
Shading Units
896
48
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
112
-
RT Cores
7
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
31.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
61.60 GPixel/s
62.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
123.2 GTexel/s
3.994 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.885 TFLOPS
1.997 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.942 TFLOPS
537.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
35W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Raptor Lake GT1
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
Generation 12.2
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
