Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs GeForce 320M
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 580 and 0System Shared VRAM GeForce 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics 580 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 23W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 580
+1102%
1094
GeForce 320M
91
Graphics Card
Sep 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
HD Graphics-M
Generation
GeForce 300M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
350 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
576
Shading Units
48
72
TMUs
16
9
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
8.550 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
68.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.20 GFLOPS
273.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
15W
TDP
23W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Skylake GT4e
GPU Name
C89
-
GPU Variant
MCP89-EPT
Generation 9.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
-
14 nm+
Process Size
40 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.486 billion
Unknown
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
