Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs HD Graphics 3000
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
224 additional rendering cores
HD Graphics 3000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1300MHz vs 1150MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
+195%
736
HD Graphics 3000
249
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Feb 2011
HD Graphics
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
650 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
320
Shading Units
96
40
TMUs
12
4
ROPs
2
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
249.6 GFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
Sandy Bridge GT2+
Generation 7.5
Architecture
Generation 6.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
22 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.16 billion
Unknown
Die Size
216 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.3
OpenGL
3.1
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
