Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Arc Graphics 32EU
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics 5200 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc Graphics 32EU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 65W)
Arc Graphics 32EU 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (1950MHz vs 1150MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
736
Arc Graphics 32EU
+35%
998
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2024
HD Graphics
Generation
HD Graphics
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
320
Shading Units
256
40
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
4.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.60 GPixel/s
46.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.997 TFLOPS
736.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
998.4 GFLOPS
184.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
65W
No outputs
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT3e
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
Generation 7.5
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
22 nm
Process Size
3 nm
Unknown
Transistors
17.8 billion
Unknown
Die Size
243 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
