ION vs FirePro A300
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM ION and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ION 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 65W)
FirePro A300 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock905MHz
368 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ION
34
FirePro A300
+1944%
695
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
ION
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
760 MHz
-
Boost Clock
905 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
1
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
8
32 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.240 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.72 GTexel/s
34.24 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
695.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
65W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A300
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
32 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
1.303 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.0
