ION vs Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM ION and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ION 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 35W)
Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2350MHz
1008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
ION
34
Arc 140T Mobile
+14055%
4813
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2025
ION
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
1
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
34.24 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
3 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
Unknown
57 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
