Intel Xeon Phi SE10X vs EPYC Embedded 8434P
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi SE10X with 61 cores 1.1GHz and EPYC Embedded 8434P with 48 cores 2.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8434P 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (200W vs 300W)
Score
General Parameters
Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2024
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Siena
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
5 billions
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
300 W
Power Consumption
200 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
1.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.1 GHz
61
Total Core Count
48
244
Total Thread Count
96
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
25.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
96
