Intel Xeon Phi 7290F vs AMD EPYC 9124
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 7290F with 72 cores 1.5GHz and AMD EPYC 9124 with 16 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9124 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 1.5GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (200W vs 260W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2016
Release Date
Nov 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Landing
Core Architecture
Genoa
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Package
8 billions
Transistor Count
26.28 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
260 W
Power Consumption
200 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
4x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
1.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
72
Total Core Count
16
288
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
30.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128
