Intel Xeon Phi 7290 vs AMD EPYC 8224P
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 7290 with 72 cores 1.5GHz and AMD EPYC 8224P with 24 cores 2.55GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 8224P 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.55GHz vs 1.5GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (160W vs 245W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2016
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Landing
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 3647
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
8 billions
Transistor Count
17.75 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
245 W
Power Consumption
160 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
75 °C
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
2x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
1.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.55 GHz
1.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
72
Total Core Count
24
288
Total Thread Count
48
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
15.0
Multiplier
25.5
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
64 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
96
