Intel Xeon Phi 7110P vs AMD EPYC 9645
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 7110P with 61 cores 1.25GHz and AMD EPYC 9645 with 96 cores 2.3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon Phi 7110P 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 320W)
AMD EPYC 9645 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.3GHz vs 1.25GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 22nm)
Score
General Parameters
Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2024
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Turin
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Package
5 billions
Transistor Count
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
300 W
Power Consumption
320 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
96
-
Performance Core Threads
192
1.25 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
61
Total Core Count
96
244
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12.0
Multiplier
23.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
256 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
