Intel Xeon Phi 5110P vs AMD EPYC Embedded 9654
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 5110P with 60 cores 1.053GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon Phi 5110P 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 360W)
AMD EPYC Embedded 9654 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.053GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Score
General Parameters
Nov 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Genoa
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Package
5 billions
Transistor Count
78.84 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
225 W
Power Consumption
360 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
12x72 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
1.053 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
60
Total Core Count
96
240
Total Thread Count
192
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
10.0
Multiplier
24.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
384 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
Max Memory Channels
12
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
128
