Intel Xeon Phi 5110P vs AMD EPYC 9845
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 5110P with 60 cores 1.053GHz and AMD EPYC 9845 with 160 cores 2.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon Phi 5110P 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 390W)
AMD EPYC 9845 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 1.053GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 22nm)
Score
General Parameters
Nov 2012
Release Date
Oct 2024
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Turin
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Package
5 billions
Transistor Count
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
225 W
Power Consumption
390 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
160
-
Performance Core Threads
320
1.053 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
60
Total Core Count
160
240
Total Thread Count
320
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
10.0
Multiplier
21.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
320 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
