Intel Xeon Phi 3120P vs AMD EPYC 9335
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Phi 3120P with 57 cores 1.1GHz and AMD EPYC 9335 with 32 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9335 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 1.1GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (210W vs 300W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2024
PCIe
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Knights Corner
Core Architecture
Turin
PCIe x16
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Package
5 billions
Transistor Count
33.26 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
4 nm
300 W
Power Consumption
210 W
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
350 mm²
Die Size
4x70.6 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
mm²
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
32
-
Performance Core Threads
64
1.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
57
Total Core Count
32
228
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
11.0
Multiplier
30.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR3,DDR4
Memory Types
DDR5-6000
-
Max Memory Size
6 TB
Max Memory Channels
12
-
Max Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
