Intel Xeon Gold 5317 vs EPYC Embedded 8324P
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon Gold 5317 with 12 cores 3GHz and EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon Gold 5317 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 2.65GHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 180W)
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2933)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 4)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 18MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 10nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon Gold 5317
1654
EPYC Embedded 8324P
1664
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon Gold 5317
8978
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+48%
13349
General Parameters
Apr 2021
Release Date
Sep 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Ice Lake-SP
Core Architecture
Siena
Intel Socket 4189
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon Gold (Ice Lake-SP)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
-
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
150 W
Power Consumption
180 W
84 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.65 GHz
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
12
Total Core Count
32
24
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
30.0
Multiplier
26.5
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
18 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2933
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
8
Max Memory Channels
6
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
4
PCIe Version
5
64
PCIe Lanes
96
