Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3 vs AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3 with 6 cores 2GHz and AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 with 4 cores 2.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (15MB vs 8MB)
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 1866)
Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 22nm)
Lower TDP (35W vs 52W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3
493
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
+53%
755
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 2608L v3
870
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
+211%
2709
General Parameters
Sep 2014
Release Date
Feb 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Haswell-EP
Core Architecture
Zen
Intel Socket 2011-3
Socket
AMD BGA SP4r2
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Haswell-EP)
Generation
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Package
2.6 billions
Transistor Count
4.8 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
52 W
Power Consumption
35 W
Intel
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
356 mm²
Die Size
213 mm²
CPU Performance
2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.9 GHz
6
Total Core Count
4
6
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20.0
Multiplier
21.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
15 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-1866
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
4
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
3
40
PCIe Lanes
32
