Intel Xeon E5 1620 vs Xeon w3 2535
We compared two server CPUs: Intel Xeon E5 1620 with 4 cores 3.6GHz and Xeon w3 2535 with 10 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Xeon E5 1620 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 3.5GHz)
Lower TDP (130W vs 185W)
Xeon w3 2535 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (4400 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (26.25MB vs 10MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 32nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620
690
Xeon w3 2535
+212%
2156
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Xeon E5 1620
2533
Xeon w3 2535
+378%
12112
General Parameters
Mar 2012
Release Date
Aug 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Sandy Bridge-E
Core Architecture
Sapphire Rapids
Intel Socket 2011
Socket
Intel Socket 4677
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Xeon E5 (Sandy Bridge-E)
Generation
Xeon W (Sapphire Rapids)
Package
1.27 billions
Transistor Count
-
32 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
130 W
Power Consumption
185 W
Intel
Foundry
Intel
294 mm²
Die Size
-
CPU Performance
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
4
Total Core Count
10
8
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
35.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
256 K per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
10 MB shared
L3 Cache
26.25 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
-
AVX-512 FMA Ports
2
Memory Parameters
DDR3
Memory Types
DDR5-4400
-
Max Memory Size
2 TB
4
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
64
