Intel Processor N97 vs Intel Celeron 6305
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Processor N97 with 4 cores 3.6GHz and Intel Celeron 6305 with 2 cores 1.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Processor N97 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3733)
Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 51.2GB/s)
Larger L3 cache size (6MB vs 4MB)
Lower TDP (12W vs 15W)
Intel Celeron 6305 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Processor N97
+92%
1229
Intel Celeron 6305
640
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Processor N97
+157%
2802
Intel Celeron 6305
1089
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Processor N97
+79%
2139
Intel Celeron 6305
1190
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Processor N97
+190%
5957
Intel Celeron 6305
2054
General Parameters
Jan 2023
Release Date
Sep 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Alder Lake
Core Architecture
Tiger Lake
N97
Processor Number
6305
BGA-1264
Socket
BGA-1449
UHD Graphics (24EU)
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48 EUs
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
12 W
Power Consumption
15 W
105°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
2
-
Performance Core Threads
2
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
4
Efficiency Cores
-
4
Efficiency Core Threads
-
3.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4
Total Core Count
2
4
Total Thread Count
2
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
36x
Multiplier
18x
96 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
2 MB shared
L2 Cache
1256 K per core
6 MB shared
L3 Cache
4 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733
16 GB
Max Memory Size
64 GB
1
Max Memory Channels
2
76.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
1200 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1250 MHz
256
Shader Units
384
16
Texture Units
24
8
Raster Operation Units
12
24
Execution Units
48
10 W
Power Consumption
15 W
0.3 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.84 TFLOPS
