Intel Processor N100 vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Processor N100 with 4 cores 0.8GHz and AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U with 4 cores 2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Processor N100 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2400)
Larger L3 cache size (6MB vs 4MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (6W vs 15W)
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U 's Advantages
Newer PCIe version (3 vs 3.0)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Processor N100
+58%
1204
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
761
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Processor N100
2314
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
+1%
2349
Blender
Intel Processor N100
+5%
40
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
38
General Parameters
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2019
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Alder Lake
Core Architecture
Raven Ridge
N100
Processor Number
-
BGA-1264
Socket
AMD Socket FP5
UHD Graphics (24 EU)
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 8
-
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen (Raven Ridge))
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
6 W
Power Consumption
15 W
105°C
Peak Operating Temperature
95°C
-
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
-
Die Size
246 mm²
CPU Performance
Performance Core Base Frequency
2 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
4
Efficiency Cores
-
4
Efficiency Core Threads
-
0.8 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
3.2 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
4
Total Core Count
4
4
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
8
Multiplier
20.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
96 KB per core
2 MB shared
L2 Cache
512 KB per core
6 MB shared
L3 Cache
4 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-2400
16 GB
Max Memory Size
-
1
Max Memory Channels
2
38.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
750 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
256
Shader Units
-
16
Texture Units
-
8
Raster Operation Units
-
24
Execution Units
-
10 W
Power Consumption
-
0.3 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
