Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs Intel Core i9 12900
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Core i9 12900 with 16 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 76.8GB/s)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 10nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
+6%
2893
Intel Core i9 12900
2727
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F
+38%
18519
Intel Core i9 12900
13396
General Parameters
Jan 2025
Release Date
Jan 2022
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Alder Lake-S
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
N/A
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
Core i9 (Alder Lake-S)
Package
17.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
105°C
Peak Operating Temperature
72 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
243 mm²
Die Size
215 mm²
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
8
16
Performance Core Threads
16
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
8
12
Efficiency Core Threads
8
1800 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1800 MHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
20
Total Core Count
16
20
Total Thread Count
24
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
24.0
192 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
1.25 MB per core
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
30 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800
256 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Miscellaneous
Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
5
20
PCIe Lanes
20
