Intel Core Ultra 7 265F vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 7645
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265F with 20 cores 2.4GHz and AMD Ryzen Embedded 7645 with 6 cores 3.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core Ultra 7 265F 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 5200)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 5nm)
AMD Ryzen Embedded 7645 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.8GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (32MB vs 30MB)
Score
General Parameters
Jan 2025
Release Date
Nov 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Desktop
Type
Desktop
Arrow Lake-S
Core Architecture
Raphael
Intel Socket 1851
Socket
AMD Socket AM5
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Raphael))
Package
17.8 billions
Transistor Count
6.57 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
105°C
Peak Operating Temperature
95°C
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
243 mm²
Die Size
71 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
122 mm²
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
-
16
Performance Core Threads
-
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
-
12
Efficiency Core Threads
-
1800 MHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
20
Total Core Count
6
20
Total Thread Count
12
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
38.0
192 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
32 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-5200
256 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
5
20
PCIe Lanes
24
