Intel Core Ultra 7 265 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core Ultra 7 265 with 20 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Core Ultra 7 265T with 20 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core Ultra 7 265 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Larger L3 cache size (30MB vs 24MB)
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T 's Advantages
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 5.0)
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
2991
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
+5%
3147
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core Ultra 7 265
+93%
19830
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
10250
General Parameters
Dec 2024
Release Date
Dec 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Arrow Lake
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake-S
265
Processor Number
-
FCLGA-1851
Socket
Intel Socket 1851
Arc Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake)
Generation
Ultra 7 (Arrow Lake-S)
Package
17.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
35 W
182 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
243 mm²
Die Size
-
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
8
8
Performance Core Threads
8
2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
5.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
12
Efficiency Cores
12
12
Efficiency Core Threads
12
1.8 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
20
Total Core Count
20
20
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24
Multiplier
24
192 K per core
L1 Cache
112 KB per core
3 MB per core
L2 Cache
23 MB
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6400
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
256 GB
Max Memory Size
256 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
102.4 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
1950 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
