Intel Core i9 13900KS vs Celeron P1053
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i9 13900KS with 24 cores 3.2GHz and Celeron P1053 with 1 cores 1.333GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core i9 13900KS 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 3)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 2)
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 1.333GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 2MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 45nm)
Celeron P1053 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
Score
General Parameters
Jan 2023
Release Date
Feb 2010
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Raptor Lake
Core Architecture
Jasper Forest
i9-13900KS
Processor Number
-
LGA-1700
Socket
Intel Socket 1366
UHD Graphics 770
Integrated Graphics
N/A
-
Generation
Celeron (Jasper Forest)
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
45 nm
150 W
Power Consumption
30 W
253 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
-
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
64 °C
-
Foundry
Intel
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
-
16
Performance Core Threads
-
3.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.333 GHz
6 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
16
Efficiency Cores
-
16
Efficiency Core Threads
-
2.4 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
4.3 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
24
Total Core Count
1
32
Total Thread Count
2
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
133 MHz
32x
Multiplier
10.0
80 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
32 MB shared
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
36 MB shared
L3 Cache
2 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR3
192 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
89.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1650 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
256
Shader Units
-
16
Texture Units
-
8
Raster Operation Units
-
32
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
0.78 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
