Home Comparison Intel Core i9 12900K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX

Intel Core i9 12900K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i9 12900K with 16 cores 32GHz and AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX with 32 cores 3.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Core i9 12900K 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 4.0)
Higher base frequency (32GHz vs 3.5GHz)
Lower TDP (125W vs 280W)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX 's Advantages
Larger memory bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 76.8GB/s)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 30MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 10nm)

Score

Benchmark

Cinebench R23 Single Core
Intel Core i9 12900K +63%
2028
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
1244
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 12900K
27422
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +58%
43450
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i9 12900K +62%
2631
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
1615
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 12900K
17004
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
17022
Cinebench 2024 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 12900K
1574
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +59%
2504
Blender
Intel Core i9 12900K
422
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +54%
653
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Core i9 12900K +54%
1970
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
1277
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Core i9 12900K
17028
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +55%
26498
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Core i9 12900K +56%
4173
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX
2661
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Core i9 12900K
41390
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3975WX +51%
62727

General Parameters

Oct 2021
Release Date
Jul 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Alder Lake
Core Architecture
Zen 2
i9-12900K
Processor Number
-
LGA-1700
Socket
sWRX8
UHD Graphics 770
Integrated Graphics
N/A

Package

10 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
280 W
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
90 °C

CPU Performance

8
Performance Cores
32
16
Performance Core Threads
64
3,2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
5.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
8
Efficiency Cores
-
8
Efficiency Core Threads
-
2.4 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
-
3.9 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
-
16
Total Core Count
32
24
Total Thread Count
64
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
32x
Multiplier
35x
64 K per core
L1 Cache
96 K per core
14 MB shared
L2 Cache
512 K per core
30 MB shared
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
Yes
Unlocked Multiplier
No

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
128 GB
Max Memory Size
2048 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
8
76.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
204.8 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
-
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1550 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
256
Shader Units
-
16
Texture Units
-
8
Raster Operation Units
-
32
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
0.78 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-

Miscellaneous

5.0
PCIe Version
4.0
20
PCIe Lanes
128
© 2025 - TopCPU.net