Intel Core i7 14701E vs Intel Core i9 14900
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i7 14701E with 8 cores 2.6GHz and Intel Core i9 14900 with 24 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core i7 14701E 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Higher base frequency (2.6GHz vs 2.0GHz)
Intel Core i9 14900 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 5600)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 5)
Larger L3 cache size (36MB vs 33MB)
Score
General Parameters
Jul 2024
Release Date
Jan 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Instruction Set
x86-64
Raptor Lake-R
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake Refresh
-
Processor Number
i9-14900
Intel Socket 1700
Socket
LGA-1700
UHD Graphics 770
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Generation
-
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
219 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
Intel
Foundry
-
257 mm²
Die Size
-
CPU Performance
-
Performance Cores
8
-
Performance Core Threads
16
2.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
5.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
16
-
Efficiency Core Threads
16
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
8
Total Core Count
24
16
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.0
Multiplier
20x
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB per core
33 MB shared
L3 Cache
36 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
-
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5600
Memory Types
DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
-
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
89.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1650 MHz
-
Shader Units
256
-
Texture Units
16
-
Raster Operation Units
8
-
Execution Units
32
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS
