Intel Core i7 1165G7 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Core i7 1165G7 with 4 cores 1.2GHz and AMD Ryzen 5 2600H with 4 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core i7 1165G7 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (4267 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (4.0 vs 3)
Larger L3 cache size (12MB vs 4MB)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (28W vs 45W)
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.8GHz)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i7 1165G7
+35%
1349
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
993
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i7 1165G7
+69%
5076
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
2988
General Parameters
Sep 2020
Release Date
Sep 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Tiger Lake UP3
Core Architecture
Raven Ridge
i7-1165G7
Processor Number
-
BGA-1449
Socket
AMD Socket FP5
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 8
-
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen (Raven Ridge))
Package
-
Transistor Count
4.95 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
12-28 W
Power Consumption
45 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
95°C
-
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
-
Die Size
210 mm²
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
-
8
Performance Core Threads
-
1.2-2.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
4.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
4
Total Core Count
4
8
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
12-28x
Multiplier
32.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
96 KB per core
1280 K per core
L2 Cache
512 KB per core
12 MB shared
L3 Cache
4 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
64 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
2
51.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1300 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
768
Shader Units
-
48
Texture Units
-
24
Raster Operation Units
-
96
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
1.69 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
