Intel Core i5 14400F vs Intel Core i5 13500E
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i5 14400F with 10 cores 2.5GHz and Intel Core i5 13500E with 14 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core i5 14400F 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Intel Core i5 13500E 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Larger L3 cache size (24MB vs 20MB)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i5 14400F
2402
Intel Core i5 13500E
+3%
2477
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i5 14400F
12609
Intel Core i5 13500E
+1%
12855
General Parameters
Jan 2024
Release Date
Jan 2023
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Raptor Lake Refresh
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake
i5-14400F
Processor Number
i5-13500
LGA-1700
Socket
LGA-1700
No
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 770
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
65 W
148 W
Max Turbo Power Consumption
65 W
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
CPU Performance
6
Performance Cores
6
12
Performance Core Threads
12
2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
4
Efficiency Cores
8
4
Efficiency Core Threads
8
1.8 GHz
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
10
Total Core Count
14
16
Total Thread Count
20
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25x
Multiplier
24
80 K per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
2 MB per core
L2 Cache
11.5 MB
20 MB shared
L3 Cache
24 MB
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
192 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
76.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
-
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1550 MHz
-
Shader Units
256
-
Texture Units
16
-
Raster Operation Units
8
-
Execution Units
32
-
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Graphics Performance
0.78 TFLOPS
