Intel Core i5 10400F vs Apple M3 Ultra
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Core i5 10400F with 6 cores 2.9GHz and Apple M3 Ultra with 32 cores 4.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Core i5 10400F 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 140W)
Apple M3 Ultra 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 2666)
Larger memory bandwidth (819.2GB/s vs 41.6GB/s)
Higher base frequency (4.5GHz vs 2.9GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 14nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Core i5 10400F
1459
Apple M3 Ultra
+122%
3247
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Core i5 10400F
6209
Apple M3 Ultra
+352%
28107
General Parameters
May 2020
Release Date
Mar 2025
Intel
Manufacturer
Apple
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
ARMv8
Comet Lake
Core Architecture
Apple M3
i5-10400F
Processor Number
-
LGA-1200
Socket
Apple M-Socket
N/A
Integrated Graphics
Apple M3 Ultra GPU (80-core)
Package
-
Transistor Count
184 billions
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
140 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
CPU Performance
6
Performance Cores
24
12
Performance Core Threads
24
2.9 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
-
-
Efficiency Cores
8
-
Efficiency Core Threads
8
6
Total Core Count
32
12
Total Thread Count
32
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
-
29x
Multiplier
45
64 K per core
L1 Cache
-
256 K per core
L2 Cache
-
12 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2666
Memory Types
LPDDR5-6400
128 GB
Max Memory Size
512 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
8
41.6 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
819.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
-
Integrated Graphics
true
-
Shader Units
10240
-
Texture Units
640
-
Raster Operation Units
320
-
Execution Units
1280
-
Power Consumption
140
