Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Core 3 100UL
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron N5095 with 4 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core 3 100UL with 6 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron N5095 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.0GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Intel Core 3 100UL 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 2933)
Larger memory bandwidth (83.2GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (4 vs 3.0)
Larger L3 cache size (10MB vs 4MB)
Score
General Parameters
Jan 2021
Release Date
Apr 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Jasper Lake
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-PS
N5095
Processor Number
100U
BGA-1338
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 64EU
-
Generation
Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS)
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
15 W
Power Consumption
15 W
-
Max Turbo Power Consumption
55 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100°C
-
Foundry
Intel
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
2
4
Performance Core Threads
4
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
4
-
Efficiency Core Threads
4
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
900 MHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
4
Total Core Count
6
4
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20x
Multiplier
12.0
-
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
384 K per core
L2 Cache
1.25 MB per core
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
10 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2933, LPDDR4x-2933
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200
16 GB
Max Memory Size
96 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
45.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
83.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
350 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
750 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1250 MHz
256
Shader Units
512
16
Texture Units
32
8
Raster Operation Units
16
16
Execution Units
64
6 W
Power Consumption
15 W
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
1.21 TFLOPS
