Intel Celeron N5095 vs Intel Celeron 6305
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron N5095 with 4 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Celeron 6305 with 2 cores 1.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron N5095 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.0GHz vs 1.8GHz)
Intel Celeron 6305 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (3733 vs 2933)
Larger memory bandwidth (51.2GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron N5095
503
Intel Celeron 6305
+27%
640
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron N5095
+33%
1449
Intel Celeron 6305
1089
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Celeron N5095
+25%
642
Intel Celeron 6305
513
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Celeron N5095
+79%
1951
Intel Celeron 6305
1087
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Celeron N5095
+26%
1500
Intel Celeron 6305
1190
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Celeron N5095
+94%
4000
Intel Celeron 6305
2054
General Parameters
Jan 2021
Release Date
Sep 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Jasper Lake
Core Architecture
Tiger Lake
N5095
Processor Number
6305
BGA-1338
Socket
BGA-1449
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48 EUs
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
15 W
Power Consumption
15 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
2
4
Performance Core Threads
2
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
4
Total Core Count
2
4
Total Thread Count
2
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20x
Multiplier
18x
-
L1 Cache
96 K per core
384 K per core
L2 Cache
1256 K per core
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
4 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2933, LPDDR4x-2933
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733
16 GB
Max Memory Size
64 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
45.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
350 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
300 MHz
750 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1250 MHz
256
Shader Units
384
16
Texture Units
24
8
Raster Operation Units
12
16
Execution Units
48
6 W
Power Consumption
15 W
0.24 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.84 TFLOPS
