Home Comparison Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Processor 300T

Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Processor 300T

We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J1900 with 4 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Processor 300T with 2 cores 3.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

Intel Celeron J1900 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
Intel Processor 300T 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 1333)
Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 21.3GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 22nm)

Score

General Parameters

Nov 2013
Release Date
Jan 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Bay Trail
Core Architecture
Raptor Lake-S
J1900
Processor Number
-
FCBGA1170
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 710
-
Generation
Intel Processor (Raptor Lake)

Package

22 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
10 W
Power Consumption
35 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
Intel
-
Die Size
163 mm²

CPU Performance

4
Performance Cores
-
4
Performance Core Threads
-
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
2.42 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
4
Total Core Count
2
4
Total Thread Count
4
-
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20x
Multiplier
34.0
32 K per core
L1 Cache
80 KB per core
2 MB
L2 Cache
1.25 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
6 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR3L-1333
Memory Types
DDR4-3200, DDR5-4800
8 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
2
21.3 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No

Graphics Card Parameters

true
Integrated Graphics
-
688 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
854 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
0.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-

Miscellaneous

2.0
PCIe Version
5
4
PCIe Lanes
16
© 2025 - TopCPU.net