Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 240
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J1900 with 4 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core Ultra 5 240 with 10 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron J1900 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)
Intel Core Ultra 5 240 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 1333)
Larger memory bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 21.3GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 22nm)
Score
General Parameters
Nov 2013
Release Date
Dec 2024
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Bay Trail
Core Architecture
Arrow Lake
J1900
Processor Number
-
FCBGA1170
Socket
Intel Socket 1851
Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Integrated Graphics
-
Generation
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake)
Package
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
10 W
Power Consumption
65 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
-
Foundry
Intel
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
6
4
Performance Core Threads
6
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
2.42 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
-
Efficiency Cores
4
-
Efficiency Core Threads
4
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
1 GHz
-
Efficiency Core Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
4
Total Core Count
10
4
Total Thread Count
10
-
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20x
Multiplier
32
32 K per core
L1 Cache
112 KB per core
2 MB
L2 Cache
23 MB
-
L3 Cache
24 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR3L-1333
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
8 GB
Max Memory Size
256 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
21.3 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
688 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
854 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
0.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
