Intel Celeron J1900 vs Intel Core i9 7920X
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J1900 with 4 cores 2.0GHz and Intel Core i9 7920X with 12 cores 2.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron J1900 's Advantages
Integrated graphics card
Lower TDP (10W vs 140W)
Intel Core i9 7920X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (2666 vs 1333)
Larger memory bandwidth (85GB/s vs 21.3GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (3.0 vs 2.0)
Higher base frequency (2.9GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 22nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron J1900
183
Intel Core i9 7920X
+475%
1053
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J1900
571
Intel Core i9 7920X
+657%
4327
General Parameters
Nov 2013
Release Date
Aug 2017
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Bay Trail
Core Architecture
Skylake
J1900
Processor Number
i9-7920X
FCBGA1170
Socket
LGA-2066
Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Package
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
10 W
Power Consumption
140 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
95 °C
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
12
4
Performance Core Threads
24
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
2.42 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
4
Total Core Count
12
4
Total Thread Count
24
-
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
20x
Multiplier
29x
32 K per core
L1 Cache
64 K per core
2 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
17 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
Memory Parameters
DDR3L-1333
Memory Types
DDR4-2666
8 GB
Max Memory Size
128 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
4
21.3 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
85 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
688 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
854 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
0.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
Miscellaneous
2.0
PCIe Version
3.0
4
PCIe Lanes
44
-
Extended Instruction Set
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX-2, AVX-512
