Intel Celeron J1900 vs Apple M4 Ultra
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J1900 with 4 cores 2.0GHz and Apple M4 Ultra with 32 cores 4.52GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Apple M4 Ultra 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (8533 vs 1333)
Higher base frequency (4.52GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 22nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron J1900
183
Apple M4 Ultra
+2119%
4061
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J1900
571
Apple M4 Ultra
+5661%
32898
General Parameters
Nov 2013
Release Date
May 2025
Intel
Manufacturer
Apple
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
ARMv9
Bay Trail
Core Architecture
Apple M4
J1900
Processor Number
-
FCBGA1170
Socket
Apple M-Socket
Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Integrated Graphics
Apple M4 Ultra GPU (80-core)
Package
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
10 W
Power Consumption
-
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
24
4
Performance Core Threads
24
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.52 GHz
2.42 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
-
-
Efficiency Cores
8
-
Efficiency Core Threads
8
-
Efficiency Core Base Frequency
2.89 GHz
4
Total Core Count
32
4
Total Thread Count
32
20x
Multiplier
45
32 K per core
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
DDR3L-1333
Memory Types
LPDDR5X-8533
8 GB
Max Memory Size
192 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
8
21.3 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
688 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
500 MHz
854 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1800 MHz
-
Shader Units
10240
-
Texture Units
640
-
Raster Operation Units
320
-
Execution Units
1280
-
Power Consumption
120
0.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
36.9 TFLOPS
