Intel Celeron J1900 vs Apple M3 Ultra
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron J1900 with 4 cores 2.0GHz and Apple M3 Ultra with 32 cores 4.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron J1900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 140W)
Apple M3 Ultra 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 1333)
Larger memory bandwidth (819.2GB/s vs 21.3GB/s)
Higher base frequency (4.5GHz vs 2.0GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 22nm)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron J1900
183
Apple M3 Ultra
+1674%
3247
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron J1900
571
Apple M3 Ultra
+4822%
28107
General Parameters
Nov 2013
Release Date
Mar 2025
Intel
Manufacturer
Apple
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
ARMv8
Bay Trail
Core Architecture
Apple M3
J1900
Processor Number
-
FCBGA1170
Socket
Apple M-Socket
Intel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Integrated Graphics
Apple M3 Ultra GPU (80-core)
Package
-
Transistor Count
184 billions
22 nm
Manufacturing Process
3 nm
10 W
Power Consumption
140 W
105 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
100 °C
CPU Performance
4
Performance Cores
24
4
Performance Core Threads
24
2.0 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
4.5 GHz
2.42 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
-
-
Efficiency Cores
8
-
Efficiency Core Threads
8
4
Total Core Count
32
4
Total Thread Count
32
20x
Multiplier
45
32 K per core
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
DDR3L-1333
Memory Types
LPDDR5-6400
8 GB
Max Memory Size
512 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
8
21.3 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
819.2 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
688 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
854 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
-
Shader Units
10240
-
Texture Units
640
-
Raster Operation Units
320
-
Execution Units
1280
-
Power Consumption
140
0.04 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
