Intel Celeron G6900 vs Intel Core i7 6700T
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron G6900 with 2 cores 3.4GHz and Intel Core i7 6700T with 4 cores 2.8GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron G6900 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 2133)
Larger memory bandwidth (76.8GB/s vs 34.1GB/s)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 2.8GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)
Intel Core i7 6700T 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (8MB vs 4MB)
Lower TDP (35W vs 46W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron G6900
+45%
1666
Intel Core i7 6700T
1144
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron G6900
2676
Intel Core i7 6700T
+21%
3245
Blender
Intel Celeron G6900
22
Intel Core i7 6700T
+154%
56
General Parameters
Jan 2022
Release Date
Sep 2015
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Alder Lake
Core Architecture
Skylake
G6900
Processor Number
-
LGA-1700
Socket
Intel Socket 1151
UHD Graphics 710
Integrated Graphics
HD Graphics 530
-
Generation
Core i7(Skylake)
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
46 W
Power Consumption
35 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
Intel
CPU Performance
2
Performance Cores
4
2
Performance Core Threads
8
3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
2
Total Core Count
4
2
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34x
Multiplier
28.0
80 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1280 K per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR3, DDR4-2133
128 GB
Max Memory Size
64
2
Max Memory Channels
2
76.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
34.1 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
1300 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
1100 MHz
128
Shader Units
-
8
Texture Units
-
8
Raster Operation Units
-
16
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
0.36 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
