Intel Celeron G6900 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718
We compared two desktop CPUs: Intel Celeron G6900 with 2 cores 3.4GHz and AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 with 8 cores 1.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron G6900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5.0 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 1.7GHz)
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718 's Advantages
Larger L3 cache size (8MB vs 4MB)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 10nm)
Lower TDP (10W vs 46W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron G6900
+5%
1666
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718
1572
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron G6900
2676
AMD Ryzen Embedded V2718
+93%
5178
General Parameters
Jan 2022
Release Date
Nov 2020
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Desktop
Type
Desktop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Alder Lake
Core Architecture
Renoir
G6900
Processor Number
-
LGA-1700
Socket
AMD Socket FP6
UHD Graphics 710
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics 448SP
-
Generation
Ryzen Embedded (Zen 2 (Renoir))
Package
-
Transistor Count
9.8 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
7 nm
46 W
Power Consumption
10 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105°C
-
Foundry
TSMC
-
Die Size
156 mm²
CPU Performance
2
Performance Cores
-
2
Performance Core Threads
-
3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
4.15 GHz
2
Total Core Count
8
2
Total Thread Count
16
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34x
Multiplier
17.0
80 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1280 K per core
L2 Cache
512 KB per core
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
128 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
2
76.8 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1300 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
128
Shader Units
-
8
Texture Units
-
8
Raster Operation Units
-
16
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
0.36 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
