Intel Celeron 6305 vs Intel Celeron N5095
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron 6305 with 2 cores 1.8GHz and Intel Celeron N5095 with 4 cores 2.0GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron 6305 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance
Higher specification of memory (3733 vs 2933)
Larger memory bandwidth (51.2GB/s vs 45.8GB/s)
Intel Celeron N5095 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.0GHz vs 1.8GHz)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron 6305
+27%
640
Intel Celeron N5095
503
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron 6305
1089
Intel Celeron N5095
+33%
1449
Geekbench 5 Single Core
Intel Celeron 6305
513
Intel Celeron N5095
+25%
642
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
Intel Celeron 6305
1087
Intel Celeron N5095
+79%
1951
Passmark CPU Single Core
Intel Celeron 6305
1190
Intel Celeron N5095
+26%
1500
Passmark CPU Multi Core
Intel Celeron 6305
2054
Intel Celeron N5095
+94%
4000
General Parameters
Sep 2020
Release Date
Jan 2021
Intel
Manufacturer
Intel
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
x86-64
Tiger Lake
Core Architecture
Jasper Lake
6305
Processor Number
N5095
BGA-1449
Socket
BGA-1338
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48 EUs
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
Package
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
10 nm
15 W
Power Consumption
15 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
105 °C
CPU Performance
2
Performance Cores
4
2
Performance Core Threads
4
1.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.0 GHz
2
Total Core Count
4
2
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
18x
Multiplier
20x
96 K per core
L1 Cache
-
1256 K per core
L2 Cache
384 K per core
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
4 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733
Memory Types
DDR4-2933, LPDDR4x-2933
64 GB
Max Memory Size
16 GB
2
Max Memory Channels
2
51.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
45.8 GB/s
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
true
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
350 MHz
1250 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
750 MHz
384
Shader Units
256
24
Texture Units
16
12
Raster Operation Units
8
48
Execution Units
16
15 W
Power Consumption
6 W
0.84 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
0.24 TFLOPS
