Intel Celeron 6305 vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
We compared two laptop CPUs: Intel Celeron 6305 with 2 cores 1.8GHz and AMD Ryzen 5 2600H with 4 cores 3.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Intel Celeron 6305 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Integrated graphics card
Higher specification of memory (3733 vs 3200)
More modern manufacturing process (10nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (15W vs 45W)
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H 's Advantages
Newer PCIe version (3 vs 3.0)
Higher base frequency (3.2GHz vs 1.8GHz)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Intel Celeron 6305
640
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
+55%
993
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Intel Celeron 6305
1089
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
+174%
2988
General Parameters
Sep 2020
Release Date
Sep 2018
Intel
Manufacturer
AMD
Laptop
Type
Laptop
x86-64
Instruction Set
-
Tiger Lake
Core Architecture
Raven Ridge
6305
Processor Number
-
BGA-1449
Socket
AMD Socket FP5
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48 EUs
Integrated Graphics
Radeon Vega 8
-
Generation
Ryzen 5 (Zen (Raven Ridge))
Package
-
Transistor Count
4.95 billions
10 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
15 W
Power Consumption
45 W
100 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
95°C
-
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
-
Die Size
210 mm²
CPU Performance
2
Performance Cores
-
2
Performance Core Threads
-
1.8 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
-
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
2
Total Core Count
4
2
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
18x
Multiplier
32.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
96 KB per core
1256 K per core
L2 Cache
512 KB per core
4 MB shared
L3 Cache
4 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
-
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-3733
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
64 GB
Max Memory Size
-
2
Max Memory Channels
2
51.2 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
No
ECC Memory Support
No
Graphics Card Parameters
true
Integrated Graphics
-
300 MHz
GPU Base Frequency
-
1250 MHz
GPU Max Dynamic Frequency
-
384
Shader Units
-
24
Texture Units
-
12
Raster Operation Units
-
48
Execution Units
-
15 W
Power Consumption
-
0.84 TFLOPS
Graphics Performance
-
