HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Google Tensor G4
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2360MHz HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs. 8 cores 3100MHz Google Tensor G4 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
Google Tensor G4 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (2.5267 TFLOPS vs 0.0576 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (3100MHz vs 2360MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 16nm)
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
HiSilicon Kirin 659
103952
Google Tensor G4
+1031%
1176410
FP32 (float)
HiSilicon Kirin 659
57
Google Tensor G4
+4331%
2526
CPU
4x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A520
2360 MHz
Frequency
3100 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv9.2-A
16 nm
Process
4 nm
4
Transistor count
-
-
Manufacturing
Samsung
Graphics
Mali-T830 MP2
GPU name
Mali-G715 MP7
900 MHz
GPU frequency
940 MHz
2
Execution units
-
16
Shading units
192
4
Max size
16
0.0576 TFLOPS
FLOPS
2.5267 TFLOPS
1.0
Vulkan version
1.3
1.2
OpenCL version
2.0
11
DirectX version
-
Memory
LPDDR3
Memory type
LPDDR5X
933 MHz
Memory frequency
4200 MHz
2x 32 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
-
Max bandwidth
64 Gbit/s
Multimedia (ISP)
No
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
1920 x 1200
Max display resolution
3840 x 2400
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
Max camera resolution
-
1K at 60FPS
Video capture
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Modem
Exynos 5400
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 7
4G support
-
No
5G support
Yes
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
-
Up to 50 Mbps
Upload speed
-
4
Wi-Fi
7
4.2
Bluetooth
5.3
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Info
Jan 2017
Announced
Aug 2024
Mid range
Class
Flagship
Hi6250
Model number
-
