HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2120MHz HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs. 8 cores 1600MHz Samsung Exynos 7870 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
HiSilicon Kirin 655 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (0.0576 TFLOPS vs 0.0224 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2120MHz vs 1600MHz)
Released 10 months late
Samsung Exynos 7870 's Advantages
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 16nm)
Lower TDP (3W vs 5W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
HiSilicon Kirin 655
+9%
189
Samsung Exynos 7870
172
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
HiSilicon Kirin 655
+40%
694
Samsung Exynos 7870
495
FP32 (float)
HiSilicon Kirin 655
+159%
57
Samsung Exynos 7870
22
CPU
4x 2.12 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
8x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53
2120 MHz
Frequency
1600 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv8-A
16 nm
Process
14 nm
4
Transistor count
2
5 W
TDP
3 W
-
Manufacturing
Samsung
Graphics
Mali-T830 MP2
GPU name
Mali-T830 MP1
900 MHz
GPU frequency
700 MHz
2
Execution units
1
16
Shading units
16
4
Max size
4
0.0576 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.0224 TFLOPS
1.0
Vulkan version
1.0
1.2
OpenCL version
1.2
11
DirectX version
11
Memory
LPDDR3
Memory type
LPDDR3
933 MHz
Memory frequency
933 MHz
2x 32 Bit
Bus
1x 32 Bit
Multimedia (ISP)
No
Neural processor (NPU)
No
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
eMMC 5.1
1920 x 1200
Max display resolution
1920 x 1200
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
Max camera resolution
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
1K at 60FPS
Video capture
1K at 60FPS
1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
1080p at 60FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 6
No
5G support
No
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 300 Mbps
Up to 50 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 50 Mbps
4
Wi-Fi
5
4.1
Bluetooth
4.1
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
