HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs Apple A16 Bionic
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2120MHz HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs. 6 cores 3460MHz Apple A16 Bionic . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
HiSilicon Kirin 655 's Advantages
Lower TDP (5W vs 8W)
Apple A16 Bionic 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (1.7894 TFLOPS vs 0.0576 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (3460MHz vs 2120MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 16nm)
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HiSilicon Kirin 655
57
Apple A16 Bionic
+3038%
1789
CPU
4x 2.12 GHz – Cortex-A53
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53
Architecture
2x 3.46 GHz – Everest
4x 2.02 GHz – Sawtooth
2120 MHz
Frequency
3460 MHz
8
Cores
6
ARMv8-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.6-A
-
L2 cache
16 MB
16 nm
Process
4 nm
4
Transistor count
16
5 W
TDP
8 W
-
Manufacturing
TSMC
Graphics
Mali-T830 MP2
GPU name
Apple A16 GPU
900 MHz
GPU frequency
1398 MHz
2
Execution units
5
16
Shading units
128
4
Max size
6
0.0576 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.7894 TFLOPS
1.0
Vulkan version
-
1.2
OpenCL version
-
11
DirectX version
-
Memory
LPDDR3
Memory type
LPDDR5
933 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
2x 32 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
-
Max bandwidth
51.2 Gbit/s
AI
-
NPU
Neural Engine
Multimedia (ISP)
No
Neural processor (NPU)
Neural Engine
eMMC 5.1
Storage type
NVMe
1920 x 1200
Max display resolution
2796 x 1290
1x 16MP, 2x 8MP
Max camera resolution
1x 48MP
1K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
1080p at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV, AC-3, E-AC-3, AAX, AAX+
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 7
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
No
5G support
Yes
Up to 300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 7500 Mbps
Up to 50 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 3500 Mbps
4
Wi-Fi
6
4.1
Bluetooth
5.3
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Info
Dec 2016
Announced
Sep 2022
Mid range
Class
Flagship
-
Model number
APL1W10
