HD Graphics 510 vs Radeon HD 8400 IGP
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 510 and 0System Shared VRAM Radeon HD 8400 IGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
HD Graphics 510 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
Lower TDP (15W vs 25W)
Radeon HD 8400 IGP 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 510
+12%
173
Radeon HD 8400 IGP
154
Graphics Card
Sep 2015
Release Date
Nov 2013
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Kabini
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
300 MHz
Base Clock
-
900 MHz
Boost Clock
-
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
96
Shading Units
128
12
TMUs
8
3
ROPs
4
Theoretical Performance
2.700 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
10.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
345.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
172.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
153.6 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.600 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Skylake GT1
GPU Name
Kalindi
Generation 9.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm+
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.178 billion
Unknown
Die Size
110 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.3
