HD Graphics 4200 vs Iris Plus Graphics 640
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 4200 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
HD Graphics 4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (4W vs 15W)
Iris Plus Graphics 640 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1100MHz vs 850MHz)
224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 4200
272
Iris Plus Graphics 640
+210%
845
Graphics Card
Sep 2013
Release Date
Jan 2017
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
160
Shading Units
384
20
TMUs
48
2
ROPs
6
Theoretical Performance
1.700 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
17.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.690 TFLOPS
272.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
844.8 GFLOPS
68.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
4W
TDP
15W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT2
GPU Name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Generation 7.5
Architecture
Generation 9.5
Intel
Foundry
Intel
22 nm
Process Size
14 nm++
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.0
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
