HD Graphics 4200 vs FirePro A320
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 4200 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
HD Graphics 4200 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (4W vs 100W)
FirePro A320 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (955MHz vs 850MHz)
224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 4200
272
FirePro A320
+169%
733
Graphics Card
Sep 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
200 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
160
Shading Units
384
20
TMUs
24
2
ROPs
8
Theoretical Performance
1.700 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
17.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
272.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
68.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
4W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
Haswell GT2
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
Generation 7.5
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
22 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.0
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
