HD Graphics 3000 vs Arc 140T Mobile
We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM HD Graphics 3000 and 0System Shared VRAM Arc 140T Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc 140T Mobile 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (2350MHz vs 1300MHz)
928 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HD Graphics 3000
249
Arc 140T Mobile
+1832%
4813
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jan 2025
HD Graphics-M
Generation
Arc Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
650 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1300 MHz
Boost Clock
2350 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared
Memory
System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent
Render Config
96
Shading Units
1024
12
TMUs
64
2
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.20 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.626 TFLOPS
249.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.813 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1203 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Graphics Processor
Sandy Bridge GT2+
GPU Name
Arrow Lake
Generation 6.0
Architecture
Xe2-LPG
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
32 nm
Process Size
3 nm
1.16 billion
Transistors
Unknown
216 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
