GRID M40 vs Quadro K3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M40 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GRID M40 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M40
+5%
793
Quadro K3000M
753
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Jun 2012
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
384
Shading Units
576
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
33.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
793.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
24.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
