CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
Comparison
Google Tensor vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
Google Tensor vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
VS
Google Tensor
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2800MHz Google Tensor vs. 8 cores 2400MHz HiSilicon Kirin 8000 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
Google Tensor 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (2.1709 TFLOPS vs 0.4423 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2800MHz vs 2400MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 7nm)
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
Google Tensor
+42%
930661
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
653311
Geekbench 6 Single Core
Google Tensor
+31%
1317
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
999
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
Google Tensor
+8%
3208
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
2948
FP32 (float)
Google Tensor
+390%
2170
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
442
Google Tensor
VS
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
CPU
2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1 2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
Architecture
1x 2.4 GHz – 1xA77 H 3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L 4x 1.84 GHz – A55
2800 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
3 MB
L2 cache
-
0
L3 cache
-
5 nm
Process
7 nm
5.6 W
TDP
-
Samsung
Manufacturing
SMIC
Graphics
Mali-G78 MP20
GPU name
Mali-G610 MP4
848 MHz
GPU frequency
864 MHz
20
Execution units
-
64
Shading units
128
12
Max size
12
2.1709 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.4423 TFLOPS
1.3
Vulkan version
1.3
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
12
DirectX version
-
Memory
LPDDR5
Memory type
LPDDR5
3200 MHz
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
51.2 Gbit/s
Max bandwidth
51.2 Gbit/s
AI
Tensor Processing Unit
NPU
-
Multimedia (ISP)
Tensor Processing Unit
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
UFS 3.1
Storage type
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
-
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
-
4K at 60FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
4K at 60FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV
Exynos 5300g
Modem
Balong
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
Up to 7350 Mbps
Download speed
-
Up to 3670 Mbps
Upload speed
-
6
Wi-Fi
6
5.2
Bluetooth
5.2
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Info
Oct 2021
Announced
Oct 2024
Flagship
Class
Mid range
S5E9845
Model number
-
Google Tensor
Official page
-
Related CPU Comparisons
1
Google Tensor vs MediaTek Helio A25
2
Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 990
3
Google Tensor vs Samsung Exynos 880
4
Google Tensor vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
5
Google Tensor vs MediaTek Helio G96
6
Google Tensor vs MediaTek Helio G88
7
Google Tensor vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
8
Google Tensor vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
9
Google Tensor vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
10
Google Tensor vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
Related News
1
AMD Unveils Future Plans: Introducing Zen7 Architecture and MI500 Series
2
AMD Set to Evenly Compete with Intel in the Server CPU Market
3
AMD Launches New Instinct MI350 AI Accelerator
4
NVIDIA Plans to Launch Next-Generation Rubin Accelerators in September
5
AMD Unveils New Zen5 Processor
6
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
7
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
8
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
9
Is the AMD Ryzen 9000G Desktop CPU Coming Soon the Final Zen 5 Release?
10
Leaked Benchmark Data for AMD RX 9060XT Shows It Underperforming Compared to 5060Ti
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy