Google Tensor G3 vs Unisoc T9100
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 9 cores 2910MHz Google Tensor G3 vs. 8 cores 2700MHz Unisoc T9100 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
Google Tensor G3 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (2.4158 TFLOPS vs 0.1997 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2910MHz vs 2700MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 6nm)
Unisoc T9100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
Google Tensor G3
+89%
1016809
Unisoc T9100
537196
FP32 (float)
Google Tensor G3
+1113%
2415
Unisoc T9100
199
CPU
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 2.7 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A55
2910 MHz
Frequency
2700 MHz
9
Cores
8
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
4 nm
Process
6 nm
4.7 W
TDP
-
Samsung
Manufacturing
TSMC
Graphics
Mali-G715 MP7
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP4
890 MHz
GPU frequency
780 MHz
7
Execution units
-
192
Shading units
32
16
Max size
32
2.4158 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.1997 TFLOPS
-
Vulkan version
1.3
-
OpenCL version
2.0
Memory
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
-
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Bus
2x 16 Bit
-
Max bandwidth
17.07 Gbit/s
AI
-
Theoretical Performance
8 TOPS
Multimedia (ISP)
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3440 x 1440
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 60FPS
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
4K at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 18
Yes
5G support
Yes
Up to 7300 Mbps
Download speed
-
Up to 3700 Mbps
Upload speed
-
7
Wi-Fi
5
5.3
Bluetooth
5.3
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
