Google Tensor G3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 9 cores 2910MHz Google Tensor G3 vs. 8 cores 2360MHz HiSilicon Kirin 820 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
Google Tensor G3 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (2.4158 TFLOPS vs 0.6528 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2910MHz vs 2360MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 7nm)
Lower TDP (4.7W vs 5W)
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
Google Tensor G3
+104%
1016809
HiSilicon Kirin 820
498005
FP32 (float)
Google Tensor G3
+270%
2415
HiSilicon Kirin 820
652
CPU
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55
2910 MHz
Frequency
2360 MHz
9
Cores
8
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
4 nm
Process
7 nm
4.7 W
TDP
5 W
Samsung
Manufacturing
-
Graphics
Mali-G715 MP7
GPU name
Mali-G57 MP6
890 MHz
GPU frequency
850 MHz
7
Execution units
6
192
Shading units
64
16
Max size
12
2.4158 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.6528 TFLOPS
-
Vulkan version
1.3
-
OpenCL version
2.0
-
DirectX version
12
Memory
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
-
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
-
Max bandwidth
31.78 Gbit/s
Multimedia (ISP)
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 2.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
3360 x 1440
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
1x 48MP, 2x 20MP
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
-
Modem
Balong 5000
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
LTE Cat. 24
Yes
5G support
Yes
Up to 7300 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 4600 Mbps
Up to 3700 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 200 Mbps
7
Wi-Fi
6
5.3
Bluetooth
5.1
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou
