Google Tensor G3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 9 cores 2910MHz Google Tensor G3 vs. 8 cores 2400MHz HiSilicon Kirin 8000 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
Google Tensor G3 's Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (2.4158 TFLOPS vs 0.4423 TFLOPS )
Higher Frequency (2910MHz vs 2400MHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 7nm)
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Score
Benchmark
AnTuTu 10
Google Tensor G3
+55%
1016809
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
653311
FP32 (float)
Google Tensor G3
+446%
2415
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
442
CPU
1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
Architecture
1x 2.4 GHz – 1xA77 H
3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
4x 1.84 GHz – A55
2910 MHz
Frequency
2400 MHz
9
Cores
8
ARMv9-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
4 nm
Process
7 nm
4.7 W
TDP
-
Samsung
Manufacturing
SMIC
Graphics
Mali-G715 MP7
GPU name
Mali-G610 MP4
890 MHz
GPU frequency
864 MHz
7
Execution units
-
192
Shading units
128
16
Max size
12
2.4158 TFLOPS
FLOPS
0.4423 TFLOPS
-
Vulkan version
1.3
-
OpenCL version
2.0
Memory
LPDDR5X
Memory type
LPDDR5
-
Memory frequency
3200 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
-
Max bandwidth
51.2 Gbit/s
Multimedia (ISP)
Yes
Neural processor (NPU)
Yes
UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
Storage type
UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
3840 x 2160
Max display resolution
-
1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
Max camera resolution
-
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video capture
4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video playback
4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
Video codecs
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
-
Modem
Balong
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 24
4G support
-
Yes
5G support
Yes
Up to 7300 Mbps
Download speed
-
Up to 3700 Mbps
Upload speed
-
7
Wi-Fi
6
5.3
Bluetooth
5.2
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
